Supreme Court Rules Vaccine Makers Cannot Be Sued When Their Vaccines Cause Irreparable Harm to Your Children

In the news article below, you’ll learn that the Supreme Court has now ruled that vaccine makers cannot be sued when their vaccines harm your children – even if it’s permanent, irreparable harm!

It’s the very definition of tyranny:

First the government makes childhood vaccines mandatory, then it absolves the vaccine makers of any responsibility for their product, giving them a forced monopoly with no concurrent responsibility.

In essence, you’re forced to use a product on young children that can harm them, and when it does harm them, the government makes sure there’s not a damned thing you can do about it.

There are exemptions to the mandatory vaccinations of children, of course. But without guidance, trying to legally opt-out of childhood vaccines can be like working your way through a labyrinth. To protect your children from mandatory vaccines, you have to know how to beat the system.

That’s why I recommend a book titled The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions, by my old friend and top vaccine rights lawyer Alan Phillips who has been fighting for the rights of parents and children to legally avoid vaccines for several decades now.

(I published Alan’s ground-breaking article, Dispelling Vaccination Myths, back in 1996, as a chapter in my second book, The Ultimate Immune System Repair Manual. In that article, Alan demolishes many of the myths we’ve been told about vaccines, such as the false notion that vaccines triggered the decline in infectious diseases, and that ridiculous assertion that adverse events from vaccines are “rare.”)

What really gripes my soul about the news article below is this line:

"Today's Supreme Court decision protects children by strengthening our national immunization system and ensuring that vaccines will continue to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in this country."

What it should have said, of course, if the truth were being told, is this:

“Today’s Supreme Court decision protects vaccine makers by eliminating the rights of parents to be compensated for the permanent crippling damages suffered by their children after being vaccinated, and will ensure that vaccine makers can continue to indiscriminately and without fear of repercussions make and sell products that can cause irreparable harm to children.”

But of course, the news media is little more than the public relations mouthpiece for pharmaceutical companies – that, thanks largely to the hundreds of millions of dollars per year the drug industry spends with the media on prescription drug advertisements.

So you can rest assured the news is pretty much always going to be slanted in favor of Big Pharma when it comes to topics like this one.

Below you can read excerpts from the news article that has me in such a lather, today. Read it and weep, folks.

Your rights to protect your own children from harm are being taken away from you.

The Supreme Court has made it the law of the land: Big Pharma can destroy your child’s life, and there’s nothing you can do about it, unless you’re wise enough to avoid the vaccines in the first place.

Supreme Court Rules Vaccine Makers

Cannot Be Sued When Their Vaccines Harm Your Children

The Supreme Court today gave vaccine manufacturers greater protection from lawsuits by parents who say vaccinations harmed their children, ruling that Congress had blocked those types of claims against drug makers.

In a 6-2 decision, the justices said Congress had effectively shut the courthouse door to these lawsuits in 1986, when it created a special vaccine court designed to compensate victims of vaccine injuries.

The decision immediately was hailed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which said it would safeguard the nation's vaccine supply by protecting vaccine makers from potentially crippling legal liability--which could have driven manufacturers out of the vaccine market.

"Childhood vaccines are among the greatest medical breakthroughs of the last century," said the organization's president, Dr. O. Marion Burton. "Today's Supreme Court decision protects children by strengthening our national immunization system and ensuring that vaccines will continue to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in this country."

But it was a crushing defeat for the parents of Hannah Bruesewitz, who have waged a years-long legal battle after their daughter suffered a series of seizures when she got a routine DPT vaccination at her 6-month checkup.

The seizures caused Hannah severe brain damage. Today, 19 years later, her vocabulary is that of a toddler.

With Hannah facing a lifetime of constant care, the Bruesewitz's first filed a claim for compensation in the special vaccine court, under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Congress, concerned that runaway jury verdicts would drive vaccine makers out of the market, created that program for families whose children suffer adverse reactions from vaccines.

When their claim was denied, they sued Wyeth, the vaccine manufacturer, arguing the DPT vaccination was defectively designed and that the company could have provided a safer vaccine.

"Someone has to be responsible for this," Robie Bruesewitz, Hannah's mother, said when the Court took up their case.

But courts ruled against them, holding that vaccine compensation program was the sole way to handle those types of lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers. And today, the Supreme Court agreed.

The vaccine protocol Hannah received injured 65 other children. In 1998, it was removed from the market.

But that was too late for Hannah.

"We should have been taking our daughter to college this fall," her mother told CBS News last October. "If she would have been a normally, typically developing child, she'd be going to college."

From: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504564_162-20034847-504564.html

Helpful Links:

The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions

Boost Cellular Energy With D-Ribose

Reverse Memory Loss With Vinpocetine

Pregnenolone: The Happiness Hormone

DMG: The Anti-Aging Nutrient of the 21^st Century

Boost Sexual Libido With Maca Root

CMO: The 30-Day Arthritis Pain Cure

Hoodia: Eliminates Hunger Pang All Day Long

Jubilee 3: Repairing Arthritic Joints, Naturally

Make Your Own Colloidal Silver Inexpensively

Real-Life Colloidal Silver Success Stories

The Colloidal Silver Secrets Video

Colloidal Silver Secrets Group on Facebook

Meet Steve Barwick

Forced Vaccinations and the Myth Behind "Herd Immunity"

Dr. Russell Blaylock's latest article, Forced Vaccines and the Myth Behind Herd Immunity (see below), blows the lid off the misguided notion that high rates of vaccination among the population is necessary for keeping infectious disease at bay, and is thus in the public interest to enforce.

Don't miss this important article if you've ever had to argue with someone claiming that forced vaccines are necessary in order to "protect the public" from illness and disease, and prevent a pandemic.

For those just becoming enlightened to the inherent dangers of vaccines, you might want to consider obtaining a copy of Attorney Alan Phillips' inexpensive book, The Authorative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions, which explains how to obtain legal vaccine exemptions throughout the United States. It is still available inexpensively, here.

In the event government-mandated (i.e., forced) vaccinations are instituted, see the blog post Detoxifying Naturally from Mandatory Flu Vaccines, where you'll learn which specific natural substances can be used to bring detoxification, healing and relief from vaccine toxins.

For serious cases in which vaccines have caused significant toxicity problems and side effects, you might want to consider looking into the services of Dr. Rashid Buttar, D.O. at the Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research. This is the doctor who successfully treated Washington Redskins cheerleader Desiree Jennings with natural medicine after she was completely incapacitated following a Swine Flu vaccine.

-- Spencer

Forced Vaccinations and the Myth Behind "Herd Immunity"

By Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D.

December 2009

Those who are observant have noticed a dangerous trend in the United States, as well as worldwide, and that is the resorting of various governments at different levels to mandating forced vaccination upon the public at large.

My State of Mississippi has one of the most-restrictive vaccine-exemption laws in the United States, where exemptions are allowed only upon medical recommendation. Ironically, this is only on paper, as many have had as many as three physicians, some experts in neurological damage caused by vaccines, provide written calls for exemption, only to be turned down by the State’s public-health officer.

Worse are the States, such as Massachusetts, New Jersey and Maryland, where forced vaccinations have either been mandated by the courts, the state legislature, or have such legislation pending. All of such policies strongly resemble those policies found in National Socialist empires, Stalinist countries, or Communist China.

When public-health officers are asked for the legal justification for such draconian measures as forcing people to accept vaccines that they deem either a clear and present danger to themselves and their loved ones or have had personal experience with serious adverse reactions to such vaccines, they usually resort to the need to protect the public.

One quickly concludes that if the vaccines are as effective as being touted by the public-health officials, then why should one fear the unvaccinated? Obviously the vaccinated would have at least 95% protection. This question puts them in a very difficult position. Their usual response is that a “small” percentage of the vaccinated will not have sufficient protection and would still be at risk. Now, if they admit what the literature shows, that vaccine failure rates are much higher than the 5% they claim, they must face the next obvious question – then why should anyone take the vaccine if there is a significant chance it will not protect?

When pressed further, they then resort to their favorite justification, the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents – herd immunity. This concept is based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say 100%) of the population must be vaccinated to prevent an epidemic. The percentages needing vaccination grows progressively. I pondered this question for some time before the answer hit me. Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only to natural immunity – that is, contracting the infection itself.

Is Herd Immunity Real?

In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major problem – vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10 years at most, and then this applies only to humoral immunity. This is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.

Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.

That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

When we examine the scientific literature, we find that for many of the vaccines protective immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that 70% to 60% of the public has been without vaccine protection. Again, this would mean that with a 30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness rate combined with the fact that most people lost their immune protection within 2 to 10 year of being vaccinated, most of us were without the magical 95% number needed for herd immunity. This is why vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95% effectiveness rates.

Without the mantra of herd immunity, these public-health officials would not be able to justify forced mass vaccinations. I usually give the physicians who question my statement that herd immunity is a myth a simple example. When I was a medical student almost 40 years ago, it was taught that the tetanus vaccine would last a lifetime. Then 30 years after it had been mandated, we discovered that its protection lasted no more than 10 years. Then, I ask my doubting physician if he or she has ever seen a case of tetanus? Most have not. I then tell them to look at the yearly data on tetanus infections – one sees no rise in tetanus cases. The same can be said for measles, mumps, and other childhood infections. It was, and still is, all a myth.

The entire case for forced mass vaccination rest upon this myth and it is important that we demonstrate the falsity of this idea. Neil Z. Miller, in his latest book The Vaccine Information Manual, provides compelling evidence that herd immunity is a myth.

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

Those pushing mandatory vaccination for an ever-growing list of diseases are a mixed bag. Some are quite sincere and truly want to improve the health of the United States. They believe the vaccine-induced herd immunity myth and likewise believe that vaccines are basically effective and safe. These are not the evil people.

A growing number are made of those with a collectivist worldview and see themselves as a core of elite wise men and women who should tell the rest of us what we should do in all aspects of our lives. They see us as ignorant cattle, who are unable to understand the virtues of their plan for America and the World. Like children, we must be made to take our medicine – since, in their view, we have no concept of the true benefit of the bad-tasting medicine we are to be fed.

I have also found that a small number of people in the regulatory agencies and public health departments would like to speak out but are so intimidated and threatened with dismissal or destruction of their careers, that they remain silent. As for the media, they are absolutely clueless.

I have found that “reporters” (we have few real journalists these days) rarely understand what they are reporting on and always trust and rely upon people in positions of official power, even if those people are unqualified to speak on the subject. Most of the time they run to the Centers for Disease Control or medical university to seek answers. I cannot count the number of times I have seen university department heads interviewed when it was obvious they had no clue as to the subject being discussed. Few such professors will pass up an opportunity to appear on camera or be quoted in a newspaper.

One must also appreciate that such reporters and editors are under an enormous economic strain, as vaccine manufacturers are major advertisers in all media outlets and for an obvious reason – it controls content. A number of excellent stories on such medical subjects are spiked every day. That means we will always be relegated to the “fringe media” as our media outlets are called. Despite the high quality of the journalism in many of the “fringe” outlets, they have a much smaller audience. And despite this we are having an enormous effect on the debate.

As the Public Awakens, the Collectivist Becomes Desperate

John Jewkes, in his book Ordeal by Planning, observed that as the British collectivists began to see opposition rise to their grandiose plans, they became more desperate and aggressive in their reaction. They then initiated a campaign of smearing their opponents and blaming every failure on the unwillingness of the people to accept the planner’s dictates without question. We certainly have seen this in this debate –opponents to forced vaccinations are referred to as fringe scientists, kooks, uneducated, confused, and enemies of public safety – reminiscent of Stalin’s favorite phrase, “enemy of the people.”

This desperation is based upon their fear that the public might soon catch on to the fact that the entire vaccine program is based upon nonsense, fear, and concocted fairy tales. One special fear of theirs is that the public might discover the fact that most vaccines are contaminated with a number of known and yet-to-be discovered viruses, bacteria, viral fragments, and DNA/RNA fragments. And, further, that our science demonstrates that these contaminants could lead to a number of slowly-developing degenerative diseases, including degenerative diseases of the brain. This is rarely discussed but is of major importance in this debate.

The idea that adults and their children would be forced to submit to being injected with dozens of these organisms and organic fragments is terrifying. No regulatory agency is tracking to see if chronic diseases are rising in the vaccinated, yet we have compelling evidence of a massive rise in all autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and certain cancers since the advent of a dramatic increase in the number of vaccines being mandated.

Of special concern is the finding that many of the contaminant organisms can pass from generation to generation. For example, new studies have found that SV-40, a major contaminant of the polio vaccine until 1963, not only existed as a latent virus for the lifetime of those exposed to the vaccine but was being passed on to the next generation, primarily by way of sperm, something called vertical transmission. This means that every generation from now on will be infected with this known carcinogenic virus. There is also compelling evidence that some polio vaccines manufactured after 1963 may contain SV-40 virus.

What makes the SV-40 contamination disaster of such concern is its association with so many cancers – including mesothelioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, meningioma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, pituitary adenoma, glioblastoma, osteosarcomas, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, papillary thyroid carcinomas, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas.

The Federal government has gone to enormous links to cover up this association, despite the powerful scientific evidence that this vaccine infected at least a hundred million people worldwide with this carcinogenic virus. And, it took over 40 years just to get this far. Linking vaccine contaminations and immunoexcitotoxicity to the drastic rise in neurodegenerative diseases will probably take even longer because of the widespread growth of entrenched powers high in government and their control of the media, which is equally extensive. The fact that powerful, enormously wealthy foundations, such as the Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller series of foundations, are supporting forced vaccination greatly enhances the power of governments all over the World.

These foundations operate in the shadows, influencing legislation and government actions through the World Health Organization and individual governmental bodies. Behind every call for forced vaccinations, mandated quarantines, and home invasions, one can find one of these foundations providing the money as well as experts. Remember, the largest of the pharmaceutical-vaccine manufacturers are also providing much of the money for the foundations and serving on the boards of these foundations. The Rockefellers either owned outright or had controlling interest in all of the major pharmaceutical companies. This has given them absolute and extremely powerful access to the reins of power at all levels. Yet, they can be defeated by the truth.

Dr. Blaylock is a board-certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer. He attended the LSU School of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana and completed his internship and neurosurgical residency at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. For the past 24 years he has practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice for 2 years. Retiring from his neurosurgical practice to devote full time to nutritional studies and research, Dr. Blaylock has written and illustrated three books (Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life, and Natural Strategies for The Cancer Patient). In addition, he has written and illustrated three chapters in medical textbooks, written a booklet on nutritional protection against biological terrorism, has an e-booklet on radioprotection (Nuclear Sunrise), written and illustrated a booklet on multiple sclerosis, and written over 30 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals.

Other credits include Dr. Blaylock's DVD Nutrition & Behavior, a CD-ROM on the Truth About Aspartame, and, for the past five years, a health newsletter The Blaylock Wellness Report, published by NewsMax. Since the publication of his first book, he has been a guest on over 100 syndicated radio and television programs and appeared on the 700 Club seven times. He lectures widely to both lay and professional medical audiences on a variety of nutritional subjects.

Dr. Blaylock is a visiting professor of biology at Belhaven College and serves on the editorial staff of the Journal of the American Nutraceutical Association, the editorial staff of the Fluoride Journal and is on the editorial staff of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, official journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. He is also a regular lecturer for the Fellowship for Anti-aging and Regenerative Medicine.

Helpful Links:

The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions

Colloidal Silver Kills Viruses

Colloidal Silver Cures MRSA

Make Your Own Colloidal Silver

The Colloidal Silver Secrets Video

The Ultimate Colloidal Silver Manual

The New Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator

The Immune Manual

Colloidal Silver Secrets blog

Secrets of Natural Healing blog

How To Obtain a Legal Vaccine Exemption for Yourself and Your Family

If you're as concerned as I am about Obama's new declaration of a Swine Flu "National Emergency" and the potential that it will lead to mass forced vaccinations of the American public, then I urge you to learn how to obtain a LEGAL exemption from vaccinations for yourself and your family.

Here's what I'm talking about....

When I wrote and published the Ultimate Immune System Repair Manual back in 1998, one of the first things I did was gain permission to include Alan Phillips' excellent -- and now quite famous -- article, Dispelling Vaccination Myths.

Alan Phillips is a charming, soft-spoken and well-educated man, who, when he took his two-month old son into a local clinic to be vaccinated back in the early 1990's, had the audacity to actually read the clinic's literature concerning vaccine safety. He then questioned his doctor over several glaring contradictions on vaccine safety he found in the literature.

Furious Reaction Leads to Startling Revelation

His doctor's furious reaction at being questioned over the safety of the vaccines led Alan to study vaccines and their history. And what he discovered blew his mind.

People -- including little children -- were being disabled and even killed by vaccines on a routine basis. The post-vaccination disabilities and deaths were being written off as "coincidences" by both doctors and medical bureaucrats alike. Virtually none of it was being reported.

Not only that, but the safety data on vaccines was largely fabricated. And it turned out that the vaccines themselves -- credited with "wiping out" a variety of serious diseases -- weren't even the actual reason those diseases were abated.

The entire rationale for vaccinations was largely a lie, executed by one of the most devious propaganda campaigns in history...enforced by medical bureaucrats and politicians corrupted by huge Big Pharma donations...and specifically designed to allow major pharmaceutical companies to reap obscene profits at the expense of the American people.

A Modern-Day Health Freedom Hero

Alan then wrote Dispelling Vaccination Myths as a way of alerting the American public to his discoveries. It quickly became one of the most sought after reports of the decade, and is largely credited with helping start the modern-day grassroots anti-vaccination movement among parents.

How You Can Obtain a Legal Vaccine Exemption
for Yourself and Your Children

Alan Phillips later became a lawyer, specializing in vaccine exemptions.

He then wrote the The Authorative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions, a book I highly recommend for any family concerned about their health freedom rights and the health and safety of their children.

Will Obama's Declaration of Swine Flu "National Emergency"
Lead to Forced Vaccinations?

I bring up this important book because of Obama's recent declaration of Swine Flu as a "national emergency" and the fact that it now opens up the potential for mass forced vaccinations of the American public.

It's my opinion that the only way to avoid the Swine Flu vaccination under such a scenario is to obtain a legal vaccine exemption in advance, well before the medical bureaucrats under Obama's Health and Human Services chief Kathleen Sebelius begin to exercise the “extraordinary powers” Obama's new declaration has given them.

You need to know how to get yourself and your children legally exempted from vaccines, and Alan Phillips' book The Authorative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions tells you how.

It is the only book I know of that is written by a lawyer, but from the perspective of a loving parent who only wants to protect his or her children from harm.

Time Is Growing Short

Time is growing short. As former U.S. Army Major General Albert N. Stubblebine II recently wrote, "In all of my days in Military Intelligence, the new National Health Emergency is perhaps the most ominous domestic event I have ever encountered."

He then went on to discuss how Obama's HHS chief Kathleen Sebelius could go on to use the declaration of National Emergency to force Americans into taking the vaccine, which he believes will result in catastrophic long-term health consequences.

So read about vaccine attorney Alan Phillips' new book The Authorative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions and learn what you can do to protect yourself and your family, while there's still time to act.